Call
+91 98590 17777
What is Design Calculation of Heat Exchanger ?
Design calculations for a heat exchanger are vital for optimizing thermal overall performance and performance. The procedure starts by figuring out the heat obligation (Q), that is the desired heat transfer based totally at the temperature alternate of the fluids. This is calculated by the usage of the formula Q=m˙×Cp×(Tin−Tout) where m˙is the mass flow rate and Cp is the specific heat capacity.
Next, the correct heat exchanger kind (e.g., shell-and-tube, plate) is selected primarily based on the application. The usual heat transfer coefficient (U) is decided by evaluating thermal conductivities and the fouling thing. The log implies temperature distinction (LMTD) is calculated to evaluate the temperature gradient across the exchanger.
Using the equation Q = U × A × LMTD, the specified surface area (A) is derived. Finally, pressure drop calculations ensure system performance and material selection is based totally on thermal properties and corrosion resistance.
Users commonly enter parameters such as fluid properties (temperature, flow rate, precise warmth), preferred heat transfer responsibility, and typical heat transfer coefficient.
The calculator then computes key metrics, which include the required surface area, tube length, and diameter. Additionally, it can check pressure drop and suggest the most excellent configurations. By providing a quick and correct sizing answer, those calculators assist in streamlining the design method and enhance performance in thermal management programs.
Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Sizing Calculator
Table of Contents
What is the Working Principle of Heat Exchanger?
The working principle of a heat exchanger includes the transfer of thermal power between fluids without mixing. Hot fluid enters one side, whilst cold fluid enters the alternative aspect. As the fluids glide past every different, heat transfers from the hor fluid to the cold fluid via the walls of the heat exchanger, inflicting the hot fluid to quiet down and the cold fluid to heat up.
Various flow arrangements, consisting of counterflow or parallel flow, affect the performance of heat transfer. This manner is vital in applications like HVAC structures, refrigeration, and business processes, enhancing strength efficiency and performance.
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Function | Without Mixing, Transfers Heat Between Two Fluids. |
| Flow Arrangement | Parallel Flow, Counterflow, Crossflow. |
| Heat Transfer | Depend on the Temperature Variation Between Fluids. |
| Heat Transfer Area | Wider Area Improves Heat Exchange and Efficiency. |
| Thermal Conductivity | High Conductivity Materials Perform Better. |
| Fluid Types | Liquids or Gases |
| Effectiveness | Described as the Ratio of the Maximal Allowable Transfer to the Actual Heat Transfer. |
| Design Considerations | Contain Fouling, Pressure Drop, and Maintenance Requirement |
Types Of Heat Exchanger
Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
Plate Heat Exchanger
Air Cooled Heat Exchanger
Fin Tube Heat Exchanger
Spiral Heat Exchanger
Tubular Heat Exchanger
Plate Heat Exchanger Vs Shell and Tube
| Value | Plate Heat Exchanger | Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Made Up of Several Thin Plates. | Has a Shell That Contains a Number of Tubes. |
| Efficiency | Because of Turbulence, Usually More Effective in Transferring Heat. | Excellent Efficiency, but Subject to Flow Configuration. |
| Heat Transfer Area | Higher Ratio of Surface Area to Volume. | Lower the Ratio of Surface Area to Volume. |
| Maintenance | Simpler to Maintain | More Complicated |
| Fouling Resistance | Easier to Clean but More Sensitive to Fouling. | Can Be Built to Reduce Fouling, but May Require Additional Upkeep. |
| Size and Weight | Lighter and More Compact | Heavier and Bulkier |
| Fluid Compatibility | Restricted to Lower Temperatures and Pressures | Able to Tolerate High Temperatures and Pressures |
| Cost | Lower Starting Expenses | Greater Beginning Costs |
| Application | Pharmaceuticals, Food Processing, and HVAC Systems. | Oil Refineries, Power Plants, Chemical Processing. |
Plate heat exchanger weight calculation includes many factors, like plate dimensions, number of plates, and type of material used. The entire weight of a plate heat exchanger can be approximately calculated using below formula
Heat Exchanger Weight Calculator Formula
Weight (W) = Volume (V) × Density (ρ)
Where:
Plate Baffles Vs Rod Baffle
Both are baffle design used in shell and tube heat exchangers to improve heat transfer and fluid flow. Plate baffles are flat plates and rod baffles include vertical rods. It offer excellent fluid cicrculation
| Value | Plate Baffles | Rod Baffles |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Flat Plates Offer Flow Channels. | Cylindrical Rods Are Located Within the Shell. |
| Applications | Pharmaceuticals, Food Processing | Oil Refining , Chemical Industry |
| Heat Transfer Efficiency | Generally Higher Due to Larger Surface Area. | Effective, but Somewhat Less Efficient Than Plate Baffles. |
| Flow Arrangement | Encourages Directed Flow and Increases Turbulence. | Creates Segmented Flow Pathways to Improve Heat Transfer. |
| Maintenance | Cleaning and Inspecting is Easier. | Rod Placement Makes Cleaning More Difficult. |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Pressure Drop | Flow Limitation Might Create a Higher Pressure Drop. | Pressure Drop is Lower Compared to Plate Baffles. |
| Installation | Assembly is Simplified by Using Fewer Parts. | Assembly and Alignment Are More Challenging. |
To find the heat exchanger weight in kg, first need to calculate the weight of a single plate or tube. Then multiply the single component weight by a number of components to find the final weight. Refer to the formula and calculator
Heat Exchanger Weight Calculator in Kg
Approximate weights are given. Different wall thicknesses are found in tube mills.
-774.5 lbs Per Foot
Fixed Tube Sheet Vs U Tube Bundles
Both are tube bundle types. Fixed tube sheets have tubes that are attached at both ends to tube sheets. It is ideal for lower-temperature uses. In u tube bundle tubes are bent in u shape. This design is used in high-temperature applications
| Value | Fixed Tube Sheet | U-Tube Bundle |
|---|---|---|
| Design | The Tubes Are Secured at Both Ends. | Tubes Are Bent Into a U Form. |
| Thermal Expansion | There is Limited Expansion Capability. | Allows for Thermal Expansion. |
| Heat Transfer Efficiency | High Efficiency | Lower Than Fixed Tube Sheet |
| Maintenance | Cleaning Requires Complete Disassembly. | Simpler to Maintain Without Complete Disassembly. |
| Cost | Lower Initial Cost. | Higher Initial Cost |
| Applications | High-pressure Applications. | Perfect for a Variety of Loads and Temperature Cycles. |
| Pressure Drop | Higher Pressure Drop. | Lower Pressure Drop. |
| Fluid Compatibility | Best for Fluids That Have Similar Characteristics. | Handles Various Fluid Characteristics Effectively. |
Calculation of pressure drop across heat exchanger is important to confirm proper operation. For this calculation first need to find fluid viscosity and density as well as tube length and diameter
Heat Exchanger Pressure Drop Calculation
Formula for Pressure Drop Calculation
ΔP = f . L/Dh . Pv2/2
Where:
Gauge Pressure Of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
| Unit | Torr (Torr) |
bar (bar) |
Pascal (Pa) |
atmosphere (atm) |
pound per square inch (psi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 bar | 750 | 106 dyn/cm2 | 100000 | 0.9867 | 14.5 |
| 1 Pa | 0.0075006 | 0.00001 | 1 N/m² | 0.000009867 | 0.000145 |
| 1 at | 735.5 | 0.980665 | 98066 | 0.968 | 14.223 |
| 1 torr | 1 mmHg | 0.013332 | 133.322 | 0.0013158 | 0.0193 |
| 1 atm | 760 | 1.01325 | 101325 | 1 atm | 14.7 |
| 1 psi | 51.72 | 0.068948 | 0.006894 | 0.068046 | 1 lbf/in² |
Heat balance equation for the heat exchanger is required to find energy transfer between two fluids and heat load calculation is needed to identify the required size and capacity to transfer heat between two fluids.
Heat Balance Equation for Heat Exchanger
Basic Equation is
Q in − Q out = 0
Where:
Heat Transfer Coefficients in Heat Exchangers
| Heat Exchangers Heat Transfer Coefficients | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | U Btu/(h.ft².°F) | U W/(m².K) |
| Tubular, condensation | 50 - 200 | 300 - 1200 |
| 250 - 700 | 1500 - 4000 | |
| Spiral heat exchanger | 150 - 700 | 900 - 3500 |
| 125 - 500 | 700 - 2500 | |
| Tubular, heating or cooling | 35 - 70 | 200 - 400 |
| 25 - 90 | 150 - 500 | |
| 1 - 6 | 5 - 35 | |
| 3 - 15 | 15 - 70 | |
| 50 - 200 | 300 - 1200 | |
| 25 - 200 | 150 - 1200 | |
| Plate heat exchanger | 150 - 700 | 1000 - 4000 |
| Air-cooled heat exchangers | 10 - 30 | 60 - 180 |
| 70 - 95 | 400 - 550 | |
| 100 - 130 | 600 - 750 | |
| 5 - 10 | 30 - 60 | |
| 125 - 150 | 700 - 850 | |
| 35 - 80 | 200 - 450 | |
| 65 - 90 | 350 - 500 | |
| Tubular, evaporation | 100 - 300 | 600 - 1700 |
| 50 - 150 | 300 - 900 | |
| 150 – 500 | 900 - 3000 | |
Heat Exchanger Heat Load Calculation
Heat Load is calculated using below formula
Q = m ˙ . c p . ΔT
Where:
Material Wise Heat Value for Heat Exchanger
| Product | Heat Capacity - Cp | |
|---|---|---|
| (Btu/lb oF) | (J/ g °C) | |
| Ammonia, 104oF | 1.16 | 4.86 |
| Alcohol, ethyl 32oF (ethanol) | 0.55 | 2.3 |
| Dowtherm | 0.37 | 1.55 |
| Castor Oil | 0.43 | 1.8 |
| Fuel Oil max. | 0.5 | 2.09 |
| Freon R-12 saturated 0oF | 0.217 | 0.91 |
| Heptane | 0.535 | 2.24 |
| Gasoline | 0.53 | 2.22 |
| Kerosene | 0.48 | 2.01 |
| Light Oil, 60oF | 0.43 | 1.8 |
| Gold | 0.0308 | 0.129 |
| Light Oil, 300oF | 0.54 | 2.3 |
| Octane | 0.51 | 2.15 |
| Mercury | 0.03 | 0.14 |
| Oil, mineral | 0.4 | 1.67 |
| Petroleum | 0.51 | 2.13 |
| Olive oil | 0.47 | 1.97 |
| Propylene Glycol | 0.60 | 2.5 |
| Water, sea 36oF | 0.94 | 3.93 |
| Propane, 32oF | 0.576 | 2.4 |
| Sodium chloride | 0.79 | 3.31 |
| Toluene | 0.41 | 1.72 |
| Soya bean oil | 0.47 | 1.97 |
| Water, fresh | 1 | 4.19 |
Heat Exchanger Tube Dimentional Arrangement
| Tube Diameter | Triangular Pitch | Square Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| ¾” (19 mm) | 15/16” or 1” (24 or 25 mm) | 1” (25 mm) |
| 5/8” (16 mm) | 25/32” (20 mm) | 7/8” (22 mm) (Note = 1) |
| 1 ¼” (32 mm) | 1 9/16” (39 mm) | 1 9/16” (39 mm) |
| 1” (25 mm) | 1 ¼” (32 mm) | 1 ¼” (32 mm) |
| 1 ½” (38 mm) | 1 7/8” (47 mm) | 1 7/8” (47 mm) |
Triangular Pattern Vs Square Pattern Tubes
Tubes are arranged With closely in a triangle pattern. Manufacturing and cleaning this design is complex. in square patterns arrangement of tubes are in grid layout which are easy to maintain and cleaning
| Value | Triangular Pattern Tubes | Square Pattern Tubes |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Transfer Efficiency | Increased efficiency due to improved fluid mixing. | Medium efficiency; more consistent flow. |
| Arrangement | The tubes are placed in a triangle grid. | Tubes are organized in a square grid. |
| Space Utilization | A compact layout that maximizes surface area. | Effective but less compact than triangular. |
| Fluid Flow | Increases turbulent flow, which improves heat transfer. | Offers laminar flow properties. |
| Pressure Drop | pressure drop is lower. | Tighter packing leads to a higher pressure drop. |
| Applications | heat exchangers. | standard industrial applications. |
| Maintenance | Cleaning is more convenient. | Can be more difficult to clean. |
| Cost | higher because of complex design. | lower starting cost. |
Flat Plate Heat Exchanger Fouling Resistances Coefficients
| Cooling Tower | Treated Make-up |
0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated Make-up |
0.004 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.005 | |
| River Water | Minimum | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Average | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.004 | |
| Muddy Water | 0.0003 | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | 0.0004 | |
| Distilled Water | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | |
| Sea Water | 0.0001 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0001 |
| Fouling Resistances Coefficients Of Cooling Water (ft² h °F/Btu) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hot Fluid Temperature | Up to 240 °F | 240 °F to 400 °F | |||
| Water | Temperature | Up to 125 °F | Over 125 °F | ||
| Velocity | Up to 3 ft/s | Over 3 ft/s | Over 3 ft/s | Up to 3 ft/s | |
| City Water | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.003 | |
| Boiler Feed (Treated) | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
| Boiler Blowdown | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | |
| Condensate | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | |
| Fouling Factors [m2K/W]: | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process | Fluid | Fouling Factors | |||||
| Liquids | Vegetable Oils | 0.00053 | |||||
| Organic heat transfer fluids | 0.00018 | ||||||
| Cooling Fluid | 0.00018 | ||||||
| LPG, LNG | 0.00018 | ||||||
| Caustics | 0.00035 | ||||||
| Gas and Vapor | Compressed air | 0.00035 | |||||
| Steam | 0.00009 | ||||||
| Natural gas | 0.00018 | ||||||
| Hydrogen | 0.00176 | ||||||
| Organic solvent vapors | 0.00018 | ||||||
| Products | Heavy gas oil | 0.00053 | |||||
| Kerosene | 0.00018 | ||||||
| Gasoline | 0.00018 | ||||||
| Light gas oil | 0.00035 | ||||||
| Light cycle oil | 0.00035 | ||||||
| Heavy fuel oils | 0.00088 | ||||||
| Light coke gas oil | 0.00053 | ||||||
| Heavy cycle oil | 0.00053 | ||||||
| Liquid products | 0.00018 | ||||||
| Heavy coke gas oil | 0.00070 | ||||||
| Reboiler streams | 0.00053 | ||||||
| Absorption oils | 0.00035 | ||||||
| Solvent | 0.00018 | ||||||
| Lube oil processing streams | 0.00053 | ||||||
NTU vs LMTD
Selection between LMTD (Log Mean Temperature Difference) and NTU (Number of Transfer Units) for heat exchanger based on application. LMTD is suitable for simpler designs and NTU method is for handling complex design
| Value | NTU (Number of Transfer Units) | LMTD (Log Mean Temperature Difference) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Measures a heat exchanger's efficiency. | Shows the average temperature difference. |
| Use | Suitable for all heat exchanger types. | Ideal for counterflow and parallel flow configurations. |
| Method Of Calculation | Based on performance and capacity. | Temperatures at intake and outlet are used to calculate this. |
| Effectiveness | Directly related to exchanger efficacy. | Assumes a constant temperature gradient. |
| Complexity Of Formula | Calculations are more difficult. | A simpler temperature difference formula. |
| Heat Exchanger Type | air and liquid exchangers. | liquid-to-liquid exchangers. |
| Use Case | Useful when flow rates are unknown. | When the temperature is known, this is useful. |
Plate and Frame Heat Exchanger Physical Properties
| Property | Units | Liquids | Water | Air | Steam | Vapors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | kg/m³ | 700 - 1500 | 1000 | 1.29@STP (1.0 bar, 0°C) |
||
| lb/ft³ | 43.6 - 94.4 | 62.29 | 0.08@STP (14.7 psia, 60°F) |
|||
| Prandtl Nbr | 10 - 1000 | 1 -15 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 – 0.8 | |
| Heat Capacity | KJ/kg °C | 1.0 - 2.5 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 - 4.0 |
| Btu/lb °F | 0.239 - 0.598 | 1.0 | 0.239 | 0.479 | 0.479 - 0.958 | |
| Thermal Con- ductivity | W/m °C | 0.10 - 0.20 | 0.55 - 0.70 | 0.025 - 0.05 | 0.025 - 0.070 | 0.02 - 0.06 |
| Btu/h ft °F | 0.057 - 0.116 | 0.32 - 0.40 | 0.014 - 0.029 | 0.0144 - 0.040 | 0.116 - 0.35 | |
| Latent Heat | kJ/kg | 200 - 1000 | 1200 - 2100 | |||
| Btu/lb | 86 - 430 | 516 - 903 | ||||
| Viscosity | cP | ** | 1.8 @ 0 °C | 0.02 - 0.05 | 0.01 - 0.03 | 0.01 - 0.03 |
| 0.57 @ 50 °C | ||||||
| 0.28 @ 100 °C | ||||||
| 0.14 @ 200 °C |
Air Cooled Heat Exchanger Energy Unit Conversions
| Unit | Multiply | To Obtain |
|---|---|---|
| 1 joule/kilogram/K = J/(kg.K) = 1 joule/kilogram/°C = J/(kg.°C) | 0.000239 | Calorie /gram/°C = cal/(g.°C) |
| 0.001 | Joule/gram/°C = J/(g.°C)] | |
| 1.0 | Joule/kilogram/°C = J/(kg.°C) | |
| 0.001 | kilojoule/kilogram/°C = kJ/(kg.°C) | |
| 0.000239 | kilocalorie /kilogram/K = kcal/(kg.K) | |
| 0.000239 | kilocalorie /kilogram/°C = kcal/(kg.°C) | |
| 0.000239 | Btu/pound/°F = Btu/(lb.°F) | |
| 0.102 | kilogram-force meter/kilogram/K | |
| 0.000423 | Btu/pound/°C = Btu/(lb.°C) | |
| 1 Btu/s | 106.6 | kgf.m/s |
| 1.056 | kW | |
| 0.3002 | Ton (refrig) | |
| 1.435 | hp | |
| 778.8 | ft.lbf/s | |
| 1 Btu/pound/°F = Btu/(lb°F) | 4186.8 | joule/kilogram/°C = J/(kg.°C) |
| 1.8 | Btu/pound/°C = Btu/(lb.°C) | |
| 1.0 | kilocalorie /kilogram/°C = kcal/(kg.°C) | |
| 4186.8 | joule/kilogram/K = J/(kg.K) | |
| 4.1868 | kilojoule/kilogram/K = kJ/(kg.K) | |
| 4.1868 | joule/gram/°C = J/(g.°C) | |
| 426.9 | kilogram-force.meter/kilogram/K | |
| 4.1868 | kilojoule/kilogram/°C = kJ/(kg.°C) | |
| 778.2 | pound-force.foot/pound/°R |